The constant and rising current account deficit in the United States reflect by huge and mounting current account surpluses elsewhere, especially with reference to Asia. These form of imbalances giving a clear sign that the financial activities which are related with mismatches in investments and savings on global level. If we look at few years back in late 1990s, a large number of economies outside the United States came up to the mark through increasing their net national savings. At the same time an initiative taken by the US authorities to reduced its net national savings and putting more focus on foreign borrowing.
If we talk about geographical imbalances we would see that they are not that much bad as such nor they generate capital flows through these kinds of imbalances. Certainly there should be some kind of defined process that gives a mechanism to work through global markets (World Markets) which allow savers by staying in one country they can lend and to borrowers in another, which definitely results to higher global economic growth, since those countries who are in a position of surplus savings can put investments in those countries who are not in a position to produce adequate savings internally.
In an ideal world markets such as for goods, capital and services operate efficiently. Funds stream from areas with excess amount of savings to those areas that have huge amount of opportunities for investments. But in this ideal world we see that there are no such barriers in operation for domestic labour market to the movement of workers. And there are no such restrictions on any kind of trade for services or goods or no such restrictions on running of capital across borders.
Under the light of these ideal/perfect circumstances, as economies grow, we would expect to see a certain amount of shift in the flood of savings into those regions where opportunities for investment compare to others are particularly strong and from where you can expect a positive return. This kind of floods of savings would develop an era of current account surpluses or deficits, but these are not the threats from which would worry, till mechanism of adjustment present in the market to resolve them.
In this ideal world where market functions resourcefully without disturbing policy interventions, the term imbalances can simply handle themselves in a smooth and proper way, but we have to keep one thing in mind that we are not in an ideal world, we have to face the reality. With respect to Europe and Asia domestic labour market are not as flexible and they are facing a lot of problems in the reallocation of labour resources.
However we can also see in some parts of the world domestic fiscal and social policies often stifle investment and encourage huge savings but we can’t ignore that there are still continual obstacle to the free flow of goods and services across borders. Meanwhile, few capital markets and banking sectors in particularly domestic banking started their operations when there is a rigid and ineffective policies, procedures, rules and regulations and at the same time few crucial economies particularly in Asia are maintaining exchange rates which are undervalued with the help of capital controls and exchange market interventions which results in an accumulation of excessive reserves.
Just because of these issues we see that there is inflexibility in labour market, fiscal policies which are inappropriate, barriers for opening trade, and dysfunctional capital markets and the mechanism which termed as Market Equilibrating Mechanisms are not allowed to start their operations as it suppose to be. As a result there might be a risk of continuity in current account imbalances until or unless we might get a proper strategy to resolve this.
* There might be chance of rising in public and private savings in USA and those spending will fall without a balance increase in demand in the rest of the world. If public and private savings drop in US the demand is not going to be equal by higher demand in other countries which results in a very slow growth in global economy.
* Investors could radically shrink their exposure to the United States, which may cause a negative impact in world financial markets and instability in financial markets definitely going to impact on trade in good and services or even worst by decrease in demand and supply.
* Adaptability of wrong-headed policies and procedures by the government which would make worse the damage to the global economy.
There is no relevant point to believe that we can’t apply old/historical fundamental economic and financial controls in today’s modern world. The need to believe is that we do need a mechanism to adjust market imbalances. If we took long it would affect the economy through a straight negative drop in demand and prices which results in declining in economic output as well.
(Remarks by David Dodge Governor of the Bank of Canada)
In the perspective of the global economy there is an increases amount of anxiety over the issue which is termed as Global imbalances. Those major imbalances that are exists are still unquestioned. However the threat that imbalance has given to the global economy and financial stability is unclear. These essential characteristics have converted a term global imbalances into an ideal term for research, for number of studies, articles, and reports etc both at national and international level. For a significant period of time no discussion of the crucial challenges in front of global financial markets and policy makers at international level was finalize with no indication to the “rising global imbalances”, exemplify popularly by the US current account deficit. (Chart 1)
There can be number of options to consider at these disequilibria. In reality the dual face of the issue has been a key factor of the chaos and misrepresentation which often surrounds it
The trade imbalance
First we need to know that the current account imbalances can also be taken mainly as foreign trade issues. This is due to transmit the discussion which is related to joint trade relationships between United States and China. The overall operation of US to import goods and services from china has rises by 30% yoy in 2004 to $197bn. This whole activity leads to keep and eye on exchange rates and in individual on the cause of the pegged renminbi on Chinese exports. But here what the question arises is does it really helpful the way we are thinking. In general perspective I guess its not, this approach of thinking can give an invalid and risky conclusion for example the reason of wholesale demolition of US job industry are Chinese imports! And the like.